(Part 8…and Last...in a
Series)
More than 40 years ago,
the Carteret County Land Use Plan was updated to address port development on
Radio Island.
Reviewing that document
from 1985 might be a helpful starting point for further discussion about the
future of Radio Island and the North Carolina State Ports Authority.
It was noted: “A proposal
in late 1981, for development of a coal storage and loading facility on Radio
Island sparked opposition from interested parties” in Carteret County.
“The lack of adequate
rail access and the potential environmental problems associated with coal…led
to the preparation of an Area Development Plan (ADP) for Radio Island.” It was approved
by a task force appointed by North Carolina Gov. James G. Martin. Participants
represented local governments and appropriate departments of state government.
“As part of its study of
the Radio Island issue, the task force also oversaw a study of rail
transportation problems associated with the movement of large quantities of
bulk goods through the SPA (State Ports Authority).”

.jpg)
“A study of the problem
by the N.C. Department of Transportation concluded that the movement of in
excess of 3 million tons of coal per year through Morehead City would cause
serious delays and interruptions to the community that simply were not
acceptable.”
The county planning
commission responded by recommending that any port development on Radio Island
require a “special use permit.” The SPA would, therefore, guarantee that any
proposed industrial use “will not materially endanger the public health, public
safety, adjacent water and air resources or environment.”
Further, the proposed use
“will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property” and
“will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located.”
Additional language in
the document reinforced the vital importance of prohibiting any project that could
potentially “have an adverse environmental impact on water and air resources.”
Lessons learned?
An
editorial from the Oct. 4, 2023, edition of the Carteret County News-Times
reminds readers that in recent memory there have been at least three occasions
when “the Ports Authority has attempted to foist expansion opportunities that
were explosive, noxious and controversial, including an anhydrous ammonia
facility, a liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage operation (2000-01) and most
recently, a sulfur smelting operation (2011).”
“In each of these cases
the port faced aggressive reaction from the county.” Some folks were downright
“Sufur-ious” and had lime-green T-shirts printed up.
“In the case of the
smelter facility, which was to be located right next door to the Morehead City
Yacht Basin, the public outcry was so significant that Gov. Beverly Perdue
conducted a press conference in one of the port warehouses to apologize for
what was a surreptitious effort to build the smelter,” the editorial continued.
“The ports authority had
intentionally avoided any public notice about the smelter facility and was only
stopped once a final notice was mailed to the only contiguous property owner,
which happened to be the yacht basin.”
Looking forward: Without
question, the Morehead City port is a valuable asset in the state’s economic
development toolbox.
For years, Don Kirkman, the county’s former economic
developer (now retired), tried his best to broker a workable deal for the best
use of the port’s underutilized property on Radio Island.
Kirkman frequently
remarked that Morehead City is the most favorable port on the East Coast when
it comes to “accessibility and convenience, located only four miles from open
ocean with an authorized depth of 45 feet.”
Maybe the hangup is the
“industrial use” requirement tag that the Ports Authority has been clinging to
all these years.
Port-community relations: a bit of a checkered past
Some 25 years ago,
scientists at the North Carolina Coastal Federation called attention to a
troubling situation regarding utilization of the Morehead City port.
A major article within
the Coastal Federation’s 2001 “State of the Coast” report carried the subhead:
“Surprise announcements and poor siting of industries result in heartburn for
citizens and headaches for economic developers. Can citizens really be blamed
for challenging projects that are designed to fail?”
In 2001, the Coastal
Federation, under the leadership of Executive Director Todd Miller, addressed
the North Carolina State Ports Authority’s propensity for sneaky behavior…and
Carteret County’s need to keep a watchful eye.
The article said: “Local
citizens have been wary of hazardous substances ever since the USNS Potomac
exploded on Sept. 26, 1961.”
The 640-foot tanker, carrying 101,000 gallons of
aviation gasoline and JP-5 jet fuel, caught fire while discharging its load to
storage tanks on Radio Island. A news account said: “Black smoke and flames
boiled more than 1,000 feet into the air.”
The Coastal Federation
advanced the calendar to the spring of 1978 when “Gov. Jim Hunt flew to the
coast to make a surprise announcement that a Texas firm planned to build the
second largest liquid propane gas (LPG) facility in the nation on Radio Island.”
The news was received with community outrage.
“There had been no public
discussion of the question before Hunt’s announcement here. At
least one local mayor had no idea why Hunt was in town before he joined the
governor on the podium.”
John Costlow, who was director
of the Duke Marine Laboratory at the time, uncovered research data contained
within a 1978 U.S. General Accounting Office report:
“Liquefied energy gas
storage tanks, ships, trucks and railroad cars were dangerously vulnerable to
catastrophic fires and explosions that could result from accident or sabotage. Large storage facilities for LPG and liquefied natural gas (LNG) should be
built away from populated areas.”
The Coastal Federation
article commented: “That fall, Costlow hosted a public forum that drew more
than 300 concerned citizens to the Duke Marine Lab auditorium to discuss the
hazards of LPG. Shortly thereafter, Gov. Hunt withdrew his support for the
project, and it was never built.”
The Coastal Federation
said: “Citizens are generally left out of economic development decisions. While
state law provides citizens with access to public records…the law draws the
line at industrial development projects that are considered to be confidential.
Until the surprise announcement is made that a new industry is coming to town,
citizens are kept in the dark.”
“When kept out of a
process that affects their community, citizens often become agitated. Environmental
issues and community concerns are often glossed over in the site selection process.”
The Coastal Federation
sent forth this message in 2001:
“Attracting industry to an ecologically
sensitive region like eastern North Carolina requires extra care. The
environmental suitability of an industrial site must be evaluated in advance,
not after the surprise announcement has been made.”
“And citizens need to be
involved every step of the way when major industrial projects are being planned
for their hometowns. It would make the process go smoother for citizens and
economic developers alike.”
Is anyone at the Ports
Authority listening? They should be.